When the government and the media have been busy trying to name new words, the last thing they need to do is make a new word for transformors.
The term for a transformer is a noun, and for a new invention, a verb.
But in a recent Supreme Court order, the court said that there was no such word, and that we should use the term transformers instead.
In an affidavit filed on February 9, the judges said that they were not trying to create a new noun, but rather to create an adjective.
The new adjective is transformers.
It can mean, “the power of transformation,” or “the way it transforms an object or person.”
“Truly, transformers” would be a word that could encompass both of those things.
But the court did not specify what the adjective would be.
The court said it had not yet decided what to call the new word, nor did it give any indication of when it would make that decision.
The court said the question before it was whether a new adjective could be found for a term in the Indian Penal Code, which is the law of the land in the country, which states that “the use of any words, or phrases, or any other forms of expression, including the use of language, is prohibited in any place, whether public or private, whether or not such use is justified by any legitimate purpose.”
This case was brought by a group of transgender women and other activists.
The group is challenging the constitutionality of a law passed in January 2015, which made transgender women a protected class in the state of Kerala.
The law said that transgender women must undergo medical treatment that is medically necessary to correct the gender they were born with.
The act also said that a transgender person can have sex reassignment surgery, but that the surgery must be done by a licensed doctor.
The doctors must be licensed and state-licensed.
The Kerala government passed the law despite protests by transgender women, who said it was discriminatory against them.
The Supreme Court’s ruling on the new law, however, was not based on those objections.
The justices, in their ruling, said that it was up to the state to decide whether a transgender woman could be a woman or a man.
That meant that it would be up to a judge to make the final determination on whether a person is a woman.
The judges said in their order that they had not made a decision on whether transgender women were women or men, but did not elaborate on the nature of the decision.
In a ruling that came out a few weeks ago, the Supreme court also ruled that a woman is a person.
That ruling is known as a de novo decision.
In that case, a man is a member of the same sex.
The justices, however a few days ago, gave an order that made a change to the court’s de novas.
It said that in its de novos, the justices have said that gender is not a concept that can be changed.
The Supreme Court is in the process of updating the de nova decision to include gender, the ruling said.